Boston on Watch Operation Condor OnlineWednesday joined the still small, but growing, number of U.S. cities that have for the most part banned city officials' use of facial-recognition technology.
The ordinance, sponsored by Councilor Michelle Wu and Councilor Ricardo Arroyo, passed by a unanimous vote according to Councilor Wu. The new measure prohibits both the city of Boston and any official in the city of Boston from using "face surveillance" and "information derived from a face surveillance system."
There are, importantly, a few key exceptions. One such exception, allowing city employees to still use technology like Face ID to unlock their personal smartphones, is uncontroversial. Another, allowing law enforcement to "[use] evidence relating to the investigation of a specific crime that may have been generated from a face surveillance system, so long as such evidence was not generated by or at the request of Boston or any Boston official" could perhaps cause controversy down the road.
It is not impossible to imagine, as facial-recognition technology becomes cheaper and more widely accessible, citizen groups (such as those today who willingly turn their Amazon Ring videos over to police every time they see a "suspicious person") running their own facial-recognition scans and forwarding that information to police on their own accord. As currently written — as long as there was no official agreement between law enforcement and these groups, and a specific crime was being investigated — it appears police would be able to act on this problematic information.
Still, the measure broadly restricts what officials can and can't do with the powerful, but extremely flawed, technology. The city can neither run its own system, nor contract out with a third party to do so in its stead. What's more, any data gathered in violation of the ordinance "shall be considered unlawfully obtained and shall be deleted upon discovery[.]"
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Notably, this vote comes on the same day as a complaint filed by the ACLU following the wrongful arrest of Robert Williams, a Black resident of Detroit, based on faulty facial-recognition tech. Williams, and the unnamed thief police were after, are both Black men. The facial-recognition software used by Detroit police couldn't tell them apart, and incorrectly pegged Williams as the criminal.
A 2019 federal study confirmed that facial-recognition tech misidentifies Black people, the young, women, and the elderly at rates higher than that of white men.
"I never thought I'd have to explain to my daughters why daddy got arrested," Williams writes in the Washington Post. "How does one explain to two little girls that a computer got it wrong, but the police listened to it anyway?"
SEE ALSO: Congressman calls out Amazon's 'performative' facial-recognition moratorium
Boston is the second largest city, after San Francisco, to mostly ban the official use of facial-recognition tech. The measure goes into effect immediately, and follows on corporate pledges of varying legitimacy to pause the sale of facial-recognition tech to law enforcement. However, as more and more cities follow San Francisco's, Oakland's, and Berkeley's (among others) lead, the sincerity of those pledges becomes less and less significant.
Good news, it seems, is still possible.
Topics Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy
Apple takes a strong stance against Trump's rolling back of trans bathroom protectionGirl Scouts around the world pen powerful letters about hopes for a better worldVideo of 'chubby' tigers taking down a drone may be way darker than you thinkGoogle goes after Uber in court over selfFacebook's new emoji are finally available to everyoneSenator finds it hard to respond to criticism from a kidIndia is so tired and so overworkedThis NBA trade marks the end of basketball's best pre15 years after surviving communal riots, Muslim artist crafts idol for Hindu templeDog DGAF when poor owner shells out $1,000 after it swallows a bouncy ballWest Elm is offering people a refund for that disgraceful couchWe finally unboxed Nintendo's Switch and turned it onActivist heroically flies over barricade to seize Confederate flagYou can almost taste McDonald's newest burger in this 'Star Trek' movieInauguration singer and her trans sister would like to talk to President TrumpPeople would rather get peed on than support Trump? Pretty much.John Legend trolled Donald Trump like a championWhatsApp hits 200 million active users in IndiaCry of the Week: Alas, poor Jar Jar! We weep for Star Wars' most hated characterHere’s why it's so frickin’ hot right now Biohacker with travel card chip in his arm fined for not having ticket Stephen Hawking hosted a party for time travelers, but no one came 'This Is Us' finale theories: Is Beth dead? 'Steve' is a new kind of aurora, discovered by citizen scientists This may be the last year for candy hearts. HELP Elizabeth Holmes, 'the next Steve Jobs,' charged with 'massive fraud' Uber employees 'really enjoyed' London play about Travis Kalanick Google Maps launches a 'wheelchair accessible' option for 6 cities Chinese reporter's viral eye roll gets censored on social media People are sharing selfies from 2012 and now, because the glow up is too real Force Multiplier Mark Hamill reviews the worst Luke Skywalker action figures Ava DuVernay to direct DC's film version of 'New Gods' The best signs from the National School Walkout Before you see 'Love, Simon,' read the book it's based on Apple 'Families' website provides informative iOS tips for parents Google rebrands Android Wear smartwatch software as Wear OS Android has gotten a lot safer in 2017, Google claims Facebook Lite is launching in the United States Bali to shut down internet on smartphones for annual Day of Silence
1.9312s , 8225.734375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch Operation Condor Online】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network