Facebook will surely be Netherlandsbracing itself for some fresh backlash from the public next week following a number of revealing legal documents being unsealed. Those documents are expected to detail how Facebook made money off children without ongoing and clear consent from a parent or guardian.
The documents are being unsealed thanks to the work of Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting. They form part of a 2012 class action lawsuit which was filed by two children through their parents. It represented a class of children who were all under 18, Facebook users, and who had purchased Facebook Credits on their accounts.
Facebook settled the case in 2016, but the documents remained sealed. Reveal requested the documents be unsealed last year because, "there is increased public interest in Facebook's business practices in the wake of high-profile scandals, including fake news published on the site and the leaking of user data." The court agreed on Monday, Jan. 14, and Facebook has 10 days to make the documents available publicly. There's thought to be over 100 pages.
Four documents that have already been unsealed give us a good idea of what to expect in the coming days. The system used by Facebook to charge for in-app purchases and Facebook Credits proved very confusing for children and their parents.
When an initial payment is made by the parent, or child using their parent's credit card, Facebook stores the payment information. The card is then repeatedly charged as the game is played without it being made clear new transactions are occurring. As far as the child was concerned, they were just using up the virtual credit purchased with the initial transaction. This led to surprise credit card bills where hundreds or even thousands of dollars had been racked up playing games on Facebook.
As you'd expect, parents receiving these huge bills contacted Facebook for a refund because the charges weren't authorized, but Facebook refused. In the case of Angry Birds, which is one of Facebook's most popular games, the average age of the player was just five-years-old, and yet they were allowed to keep buying without consent beyond that first transaction. The key point here being, no evidence was required by the social network that the parent was continuing to authorize each transaction.
It's likely these examples are just the tip of the iceberg and much more detail will be revealed once Facebook makes the 100+ new pages available to view. However, it's also worth pointing out that Facebook convinced the judge to keep some records sealed because they, "contained information that would cause the social media giant harm, outweighing the public benefit."
We may never know how deep this rabbit hole goes, but we're sure to know a lot more in the coming days.
Topics Cybersecurity Facebook Social Media
Tennessee vs. St. Peter’s basketball livestreams: How to watch liveHoward vs Wagner basketball livestream: How to watch liveTrump slurps shark fin soup as U.S. works to remove itself from the shark fin tradeThis new app is like Shazam for frogsWordle today: The answer and hints for March 18Lawyers try unusual argument to free working elephants in ConnecticutEarth to overshoot global warming targets, U.N. warns in blunt reportCopilot is plugging into Windows 11 File ExplorerBest monitor deal: Get the Samsung M8 Smart Monitor for 43% offGet Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition for $30 off with a PrimeBYU vs. Duquesne basketball livestreams, game timeRescuers rally on social media to save horses from wildfiresNYT's The Mini crossword answers for March 21BYU vs. Duquesne basketball livestreams, game timeChinese zoo thought it was good enough to fill its penguin exhibit with inflatable onesWhat is cockfishing? Why some men lie about their size on dating appsNYT's The Mini crossword answers for March 19Trump slashed two national monuments but can't downsize national parksAmazon Spring Sale fitness deals: Peloton bikes and more up to 51% off at AmazonEufy vacuum sale: Get up to 55% off at Amazon Reading the Artifacts After the Capitol Riot by Swati Rana 'Scram!' TikTok just made it to Taylor Swift's Eras Tour In the Green Rooms by Tove Ditlevsen Best Apple watch deal: Get the Apple Watch Ultra for under $630 Presenting the Finalists for the 2021 PEN America Literary Awards by The Paris Review AI George Carlin releases comedy special that Carlin would've despised Best electric toothbrush deal: Up to 41% off Philips Sonicare at Amazon Why Do We Keep Reading ‘The Great Gatsby’? CES 2024: You can now cast TikTok to your TV Best home security deal: Get the Eufy Security S220 video doorbell for under $100 Best Segway deal: Pre Someone Else’s Diary by Maria Stepanova Takako Wanted Snow by Jana Larson On Hustles by Hanif Abdurraqib Charm and How to Come By It by Dubravka Ugresic Polling stations are receiving Russian bomb threat emails, FBI says The Resistance And the Clock Waits So Patiently by Rebecca Bengal Redux: A Window like a Well by The Paris Review Insane Places by Elisa Gabbert
1.8065s , 10131.5234375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Netherlands】,Wisdom Convergence Information Network