【Caught in the Act: Promiscuous Sex Life of My D-Cup Mother in law】

Source：Wisdom Convergence Information Network Editor：Digital Culture Time：2025-06-26 17:09:05

Slack and Caught in the Act: Promiscuous Sex Life of My D-Cup Mother in lawits scores of desktop app users just dodged a major bullet.

The communications tool relied upon by journalists, tech workers, and D&D fans alike disclosed on Friday a "critical" vulnerability — now fixed — that would have let hackers run wild on users' computers. Slack's internal security team didn't even find the bug; rather, it was a third-party security researched who reported it, through the bug bounty platform HackerOne in January.

Notably, the exploit allowed for something known as "remote code execution," which is just as bad as it sounds. Before Slack fixed it, an attacker using the exploit could have done some pretty wild stuff, such as gaining "access to private files, private keys, passwords, secrets, internal network access etc.," and "access to private conversations, files etc. within Slack."

What's more, according to the disclosure, maliciously inclined hackers could have made their attack "wormable." In other words, if one person in your team got infected, their account would automatically re-share that dangerous payload to all their colleagues.

It's worth emphasizing that the security researcher who discovered this vulnerability — a process that takes untold hours of work and is a literal job — decided to do what many would consider the right thing and report it to Slack via HackerOne. For the security researcher, whose HackerOne handle is oskars,this resulted in a bug bounty payment of $1,750.

Of course, had that person wanted, they could have likely gotten much, much more money by selling it to a third-party exploit broker. Companies like Zerodium, which offer millions of dollars for zero-day exploits, in turn sell those exploits to governments.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Members of the computer security community were quick to point out the relatively paltry payout for such an important bug.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

We reached out to Slack in an effort to determine how it decides the size of its bug bounty payments, and whether or not it had a response to the criticism levied by members of the security community. In response, a company spokesperson replied that the amount Slack pays for bug bounties is not fixed in stone.

"Our bug bounty program is critical to keeping Slack safe," the spokesperson wrote in part. "We deeply value the contributions of the security and developer communities, and we will continue to review our payout scale to ensure that we are recognizing their work and creating value for our customers."

The spokesperson also noted that the company "implemented an initial fix by February 20."

SEE ALSO: 7 Slack privacy settings you should enable now

Interestingly, Slack does appear to have upped the amount it's willing to pay bug bounty researchers for coordinated disclosure. A look at its HackerOne profile page shows that, as of the time of this writing, reporting a remote code execution vulnerability would merit "$5000 and up."

Too late for oskars, but perhaps that will encourage the next security researcher who discovers a critical vulnerability in Slack to report it to the good guys. We should hope so, for the sake of Slack users everywhere.

UPDATE: Aug. 29, 2020, 1:49 p.m. PDT: This story has been updated to include Slack's statement.

【Caught in the Act: Promiscuous Sex Life of My D-Cup Mother in law】

WATCH: It's surprisingly easy to be more secure online

Related Articles

Related Recommendations

Categories

Latest Articles

Popular Articles

Hot Recommendations

Featured Column

Quick Links

Quick Links